Your cloud changes every sprint. We test not only what is there, but also what your deployments allow, and report it in a way that it gets fixed in your templates. This way, your next release becomes more secure than your current one.
Azure pentest
Microsoft secures the platform, you are responsible for the configuration. Our ethical hackers test your Azure environment the way an attacker does: from Entra ID and roles to storage accounts, Key Vaults, and linked applications. With evidence, remediation steps, and a retest.
Schedule a no-obligation consultationDownload Buyer’s Guide
Retest standard included·Reporting within 5 working days·According to the CCV certification mark
SOME OF OUR CLIENTS
| Characteristic | Warpnet | Other parties |
|---|---|---|
| Approach |  Manually tested, with AI tooling as an accelerator |  Automatic scans, exploit attempts |
| Identity | Entra ID, Conditional Access, MFA and PIM reviewed | Only looked at the Secure Score |
| Roles & permissions | Attack paths to Global Admin mapped | Only a list of cast members |
| Applications | App registrations and service principals reviewed | Left out of consideration |
| Data & Keys | Storage accounts, Key Vaults and tokens checked | Only public blobs scanned |
| Reporting | Executive summary and report for your administrators | Technical report without context |
| Retest | Included so you can be sure fixes work | Not included or available at an additional cost |
Certifications & methodologies
CCVOSCPOSSTMMPTESOWASPMeow
Developers of cable and asset management solutions
Right in the middle of the process toward ISO 27001 certification, Patchmanager wanted to structurally strengthen the digital resilience of both the organization's internal network and the product — with regular, in-depth pentests as the foundation.
The collaboration began with three black-box penetration tests and, as trust grew, expanded to include gray-box and white-box testing. During the white-box test, Warpnet was granted full access to the architecture, source code, and accounts to identify risks.
Each test delivered a clear, risk-based report that allowed Patchmanager to get to work immediately. The collaboration evolved into 24/7 SOC services featuring continuous monitoring, response, and the complete remediation of risks and incidents.
“We are very happy with the collaboration with Warpnet. The team has in-depth expertise and truly looks at how they can help us. They communicate well, are flexible, and always do more than they are supposed to do.”
Jerry SeagerCertifications & Accreditations
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes. After your administrators have implemented the recommendations, we will perform a retest upon request to confirm that the vulnerabilities have indeed been resolved. This way, the process does not end with a report, but with demonstrable assurance.
Following a no-obligation intake, you will receive a quote, and that is the price you pay. The price depends on the number of subscriptions, the size of your Entra ID tenant, and the number of linked applications. Reporting, explanation, and retesting are included by default. Below you will find general price indications for a one-time pentest and Pentesting as a Service (continuous pentesting).
One-time pentestVAT: €3,200
Pentesting as a Service: i.e. €1,250 per month
No. Microsoft does not require prior notification or approval for pentests on your own Azure resources. However, the Microsoft Cloud Penetration Testing Rules of Engagement apply: only your own environment, no other tenants or Microsoft infrastructure, and no denial-of-service testing. We routinely work within these rules and document your written authorization in advance, ensuring the test can be immediately justified even if Microsoft raises an alert.
For most Azure pentests, we work grey box: we are provided with a read account (such as Reader or Global Reader) to assess the configuration, and one or more standard user accounts to test how far an attacker with those rights can get. We do not modify anything in your tenant. A black box test from the outside is also possible. During the intake, we determine what suits your objective.
Two layers. The identity layer: Entra ID, Conditional Access and MFA, privileged roles and PIM, guest accounts, and overly permissive app registrations and service principals. And the resource layer: role assignments on subscriptions, managed identities, storage accounts and SAS tokens, Key Vaults, network security, virtual machines, App Services, Functions, and AKS. Attack paths run right through both layers, so we test them together. Where relevant, we include the connection to your on-premises Active Directory.
Yes. Secure Score is a good starting point, but it evaluates against a fixed list of settings. It doesn't see attack paths that arise from a combination of seemingly innocent choices: an app registration with overly broad permissions, a service principal with a valid secret in a pipeline, a storage account sharing just a bit too much. Exactly those kinds of chains are what our hackers look for. The Secure Score measures whether the door is locked, the pentest checks if a window is open.
